Cases 1 - 10 of 91
McBride v. YA'cup et al
as 1:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
Dytaniel McBride and Dytaniel L McBride
Defendant:
John R YA'cup, Brian L Berntson, Bradley Dixon and others
Interested Party:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBride v. Wardlow et al
as 3:2023cv01067
Plaintiff:
Curtis L McBride and Curtis McBride
Defendant:
Wardlow, Ruckers and Welch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBride v. Bane et al
as 3:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
Curtis L McBride and Curtis McBride
Defendant:
Pam Bane, Cross, Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBride v. Warden
as 23-40193
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jeffrey L. McBride
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Norton v. Marten Transport, LTD. et al
as 3:2023cv00336
Defendant:
Clarita L. McBride, Marten Transport, LTD., Marten Transport Services, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Sabrina F Norton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
McBride v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv11988
Plaintiff:
Stefon L. McBride
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc., COVIDIEN, LTD., Covidien, PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McBride v. Heavilin et al
as 3:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Curtis L McBride and Curtis McBride
Defendant:
Ryan Heavilin and A Henderlong
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dytaniel McBride v. USA
as 21-1630
Petitioner / Appellant:
DYTANIEL L. MCBRIDE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alexander et al v. Habib Bank Limited
as 1:2021cv02351
Plaintiff:
Hannah Mason, Kathleen Lynn Alexander, Holly Lau Abraham and others
Defendant:
Habib Bank Limited
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
McBride v. Warden FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2021cv00106
Petitioner:
Jeffrey L McBride
Respondent:
Warden FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
