Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Romero v. Stammitti et al.
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Romero
Defendant:
Sheriff Phil R. Stammitti, Deputy Sheriff Shea Adkisson, Deputy Sheriff K9 Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Almidon-Miranda, et al. v. Garland
as 24-634
Petitioner:
GEORGE BRIAN ALMIDON-MIRANDA, YESENIA L ROMERO-ZUNIGA and GAHELA L ROMERO-ZUNIGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
(PC) Barnhardt v. Allison et al
as 1:2023cv01030
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Barnhardt
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, McCabe, Ayala Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sydney Cooper v. Daniel Paramo, et al
as 23-55549
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SYDNEY COOPER, AKA Sidney Cooper
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Former, MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, Current, D. MCGUIRE, Litigation Coordinator and others
Cornel Jackson v. County of Madera, et al
as 22-16920
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORNEL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF MADERA, a Municipality of the State of California, BRETT FRAZIER, DAVID ROGERS and others
ROMERO v. ENCOMPASS HEALTH DEACONESS REHABILITATION HOSPITAL, LLC
as 3:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
ROBIN L. ROMERO
Defendant:
ENCOMPASS HEALTH DEACONESS REHABILITATION HOSPITAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Romero v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
as 2:2022cv02028
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Plaintiff:
Gene L. Romero and Gene L Romero
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Rogelio Ruiz v. Unknown, et al
as 22-55341
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGELIO MAY RUIZ
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN, L. ROMERO, A. RENTERIA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
