Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 672
Brandon Moe v. GEICO Indemnity Company, et al
as 22-35161
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRANDON L. MOE, individually and on behalf of all individuals of the class similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY and JOHN DOES, II - XX
Type: Contract Insurance
Sosa v. Richeson
as 22-381
Plaintiff / Appellant: Andres R. Sosa
Defendant / Appellee: Dr. Robert Richeson, Kathleen Maurer, individually and officially, Kirsten Shea, individually and officially and others
Paulus Perkins v. Cara Prvett
as 22-6209
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAULUS IRVIN PERKINS
Defendant / Appellee: CARA PRVETT, Individually and as Business Manager, V. STOKES, Individually and as Assistant Business Manager, S. MOE-WILLIS, Individually and as Regional Ombudsman and others
Defendant: VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS BOARD, JOHN/JANE DOE, Individually and as Chair and others
Kimble v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff
as 22-30078
Plaintiff / Appellant: Raymond Harold Kimble, III
Defendant / Appellee: Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office, Joseph P. Lopinto, III, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff, Lindsay L. Truhe, individually and in her official capacity as Assistant District Attorney at 24th Judicial District Court and others
Butler v. E I DuPont de Nemours
as 22-30069
Plaintiff / Appellant: Juanea L. Butler, Individually and as representative of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: E I DuPont de Nemours & Company, State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Health; Incorrectly named as Louisiana State Through the Department of Health and Hospitals and Dupont Performance Elastomers, L.L.C., formerly known as DuPont Dow Elastomers, L.L.C.
O'Rourke, et al v. Dominion Voting Systems, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1442
Plaintiff: KEVIN O'ROURKE, NATHANIEL L. CARTER, LORI CUTUNILLI and others
Defendant / Appellee: DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation, CENTER FOR TECH AND CIVIC LIFE and others
Defendant: MARK E. ZUCKERBERG, individually, PRISCILLA CHAN, individually, BRIAN KEMP, individually and others
Appellant: GARY D. FIELDER and ERNEST J. WALKER
Herbert Igbanugo v. Minnesota OLPR, et al
as 21-3826
Plaintiff / Appellant: Herbert A. Igbanugo
Defendant / Appellee: Minnesota Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, [OLPR], Susan M. Humiston, in her official capacity as Director of OLPR, Amy Halloran, individually and in her offical capacity as Assistant Director at OLPR and others
Michael Derrick, et al v. Rickie Friar, et al
as 21-6167
Plaintiff: GINNY HUMPHREY, as parent and legal guardian of minor child, O.H.
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL GREGORY DERRICK, Guardian ad Litem of minor child, OH
Defendant: RICKIE FRIAR, Individually and in official capacity, RAY DOUGLAS, individually and in his official capacity, RICHARD HODGES, individually and in his official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellee: RITA STANBACK, individually and in her official capacity and FRANK TENNANT, individually and in his official capacity
Angel Gipson, et al v. Rickie Friar, et al
as 21-6169
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANGEL GIPSON, as parent and legal guardian of minor child, B.W.
Plaintiff: MICHAEL GREGORY DERRICK, as Guardian ad Litem of minor child OH
Defendant: RICKIE FRIAR, individually and in official capacity, RAY DOUGLAS, individually and in his official capacity, RICHARD HODGES, individually and in official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellee: RITA STANBACK, individually and in official capacity and FRANK TENNANT, individually and in official capacity
Sosa v. Richeson
as 21-2945
Plaintiff / Appellant: Andres R. Sosa
Defendant / Appellee: Dr. Robert Richeson, Kathleen Maurer, individually and officially, Kirsten Shea, individually and officially and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?