Cases 1 - 10 of 18
William Harris v. City of Kent, et al
as 22-35346
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM L. HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF KENT, JACOB D. REED, JASON NIXON and others
Michael W. Bishop v. L. Harris et al
as 5:2019cv01607
Defendant:
Officer L. Harris, California Highway Patrol, The State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. United States District Court et al
as 3:2016cv00941
Plaintiff:
Keith L. Harris
Defendant:
United States District Court , John A. Houston and Jill L. Burkhardt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Burton v. Cowlitz County Board of Commissioners et al
as 3:2015cv05329
Plaintiff:
Lance W Burton
Defendant:
Cowlitz County Board of Commissioners, George Brader, Axel Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Chase Home Finance LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00246
Plaintiff:
Alonzo L Harris
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance LLC , JP Morgan Chase Bank NA and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Harris, III v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 13-15242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN L. HARRIS, III
Defendant - Appellee:
KAMALA HARRIS, Attorney General of the State of California, in her official capacity, DON HAYASHIDA, in his official capacity, JOHN JANG, Manager I, in his individual and official capacities and others
Steven Montes v. State of Arizona, et al
as 12-16515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN ARTHUR MONTES
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, CITY OF TUCSON, COUNTY OF PIMA and others
delant-cory v. Harris et al
as 1:2012cv00094
Defendant:
Ronald Grensk and Daniel L. Harris
Plaintiff:
delant-cory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. O'Keefe et al
as 1:2011cv01553
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Harris
Defendant:
Donald O'Keefe and U.S. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
