Cases 1 - 10 of 41
FIVES GIDDINGS & LEWIS, LLC v. J&L HATFIELD, LLC, d/b/a RUSACH INT'L
as 1:2023cv01797
Plaintiff:
FIVES GIDDINGS & LEWIS, LLC
Defendant:
J&L HATFIELD, LLC, d/b/a RUSACH INT'L
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Badger et al v. City of Cortland
as 5:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
James M. Badger, Marcus A. Benjamin, Sean P. Byrnes and others
Defendant:
City of Cortland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
INGERSOLL MACHINE TOOLS, INC. v. RUSACH INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00727
Plaintiff:
INGERSOLL MACHINE TOOLS, INC.
Defendant:
RUSACH INTERNATIONAL, INC. and J & L HATFIELD, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hatfield et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Hatfield and Gregory Hatfield
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hatfield v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv00840
Plaintiff:
Melissa L Hatfield
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hatfield v. Walmart, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00308
Plaintiff:
Sharon L. Hatfield
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
(PC) Richardson v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2020cv00356
Plaintiff:
Donn Richardson
Defendant:
W. L. Montgomery, P. Saucedo, A Barrios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Richardson v. Montgomery et al
as 1:2020cv00275
Plaintiff:
Donn Richardson
Defendant:
L. Hatfield, D. White, D. Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HATFIELD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv00601
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES L HATFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Melissa Hatfield v. Andrew Saul
as 19-16970
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELISSA L. HATFIELD
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
