Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Knight v. The City of Raleigh
as 5:2022cv00486
Plaintiff:
Kesha L Knight
Defendant:
The City of Raleigh, D. W. Deach, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02673
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv07590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01653
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Box et al v. Broadway Center, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01978
Defendant:
Does 1-40, Broadway Center, LLC, Cam Commercial Properties, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Box and Jean Vilsaint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr
Smith v. Watson et al
as 2:2017cv00073
Defendant:
Watson, Michael H Watson, Elizabeth P. Deavers and others
Plaintiff:
Smith and Reverend Regina Junior Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ibanez v. Ogunbiyi et al
as 2:2016cv01131
Plaintiff:
Regina M. Ibanez
Defendant:
Bayo Ogunbiyi, Will Williams, Ms. Roxy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Knight v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00160
Plaintiff:
Knight and Betty L Knight
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Mark Nooth, Judy Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arrington v. The City of Rocky Mount et al
as 4:2013cv00013
Plaintiff:
Toney Lee Arrington
Defendant:
The City of Rocky Mount, B. C. Lawton, M. B. Newsome and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Case Opened in Error
as 4:2013cv00012
Plaintiff:
Toney L. Arrington
Defendant:
City of Rocky Mount, James L. Knight, M. B. Newsome and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
