Cases 1 - 10 of 113
Moore v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv02472
Plaintiff:
Alex L. Moore
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
360 Virtual Drone Services LLC v. Andrew Ritter
as 23-1472
Plaintiff / Appellant:
360 VIRTUAL DRONE SERVICES LLC and MICHAEL JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW L. RITTER, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the North Carolina Board of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors, JOHN M. LOGSDON, in his official capacity as member of the North Carolina Board of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors, JONATHAN S. CARE, in his official capacity as member of the North Carolina Board of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors and others
Nutt v. Ritter et al
as 7:2021cv00106
Defendant:
Carl M. Ellington, Jr., John M. Logsdon, Andrew G. Zoutwelle and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne L Nutt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
360 Virtual Drone Services LLC et al v. Ritter et al
as 5:2021cv00137
Defendant:
Carl M. Ellington, Jr., John M. Logsdon, Andrew G. Zoutwelle and others
Plaintiff:
360 Virtual Drone Services LLC and Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00194
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Fletcher L Moore
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
US v. Ernest Moore
as 21-4012
Defendant / Appellant:
ERNEST L. MOORE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Moore v. Inabinet et al
as 5:2020cv04229
Defendant:
C Carter, Robert Brannon, Bryan P Stirling and others
Plaintiff:
Tony L Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Saul
as 1:2020cv03417
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Darrin L. Moore
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
