Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Mendez v. DeBell et al (Polk County)
as 8:2020cv02042
Defendant:
Tracy L. Ryles, Knapp, L. Pippin and others
Plaintiff:
David L. Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00707
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Pippin et al v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv03709
Plaintiff:
Ginger L Pippin and Harold E. Pippin, Jr.
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tavanese v. Pippin et al
as 1:2018cv20696
Plaintiff:
James Tavanese
Defendant:
L. Pippin, N.B. Gilo, San Tran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abel et al v. Willis of Colorado Inc et al
as 3:2016cv02601
Plaintiff:
Abel, Stanford Kauffman, Bradley J Davis and others
Defendant:
Willis of Colorado Inc, Willis Ltd and WGH Holdings Ltd
Interested Party:
Ralph S Janvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Kuzara v. Pippin et al
as 5:2015cv00636
Plaintiff:
Mark William Kuzara
Defendant:
L Pippin and FNU Edelen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pippins-Edwards v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12259
Plaintiff:
Karen L. Pippins-Edwards
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. Gaston et al
as 4:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
Maurice Williams Carr, Sr.
Defendant:
Milton Gaston, Percy Miles, Mary L Pippins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckley v. State of Mississippi
as 2:2013cv00275
Plaintiff:
Amy G. Buckley
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and Mary L. Pippins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watson v. Gardener et al
as 2:2013cv00360
Plaintiff:
Tracy Terrell Watson
Defendant:
FNU Gardener, Sergeant Moore, FNU Madhna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
