Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dalton v. Sapp et al
as 2:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
David Dalton
Defendant:
Lt. B.R. Sapp, L. Witcher and Clint D. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paulus Perkins v. Cara Prvett
as 22-6667
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAULUS IRVIN PERKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
CARA PRUETT, Individually and as Business Manager, V. STOKES, Individually and as Assistant Business Manager, S. MOE-WILLIS, Individually and as Regional Ombudsman and others
Paulus Perkins v. Cara Prvett
as 22-6209
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAULUS IRVIN PERKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
CARA PRVETT, Individually and as Business Manager, V. STOKES, Individually and as Assistant Business Manager, S. MOE-WILLIS, Individually and as Regional Ombudsman and others
Defendant:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS BOARD, JOHN/JANE DOE, Individually and as Chair and others
Perkins v. Virgina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00919
Plaintiff:
Paulus Irvin Perkins
Defendant:
Virgina Department of Corrections, Virgina Department of Corrections Board, John/Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witcher v. USA
as 3:2020cv00657
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Darrell L. Witcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Witcher v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2014cv01221
Plaintiff:
Janice L. Witcher
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Witcher v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv00089
Plaintiff:
Loraine L. Witcher
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
In re: Derrick Witcher
as 12-5719
Movant:
In re: DERRICK L. WITCHER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Witcher v. USA
as 1:2012cv00192
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Derrick L Witcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WITCHER v. HARDING POORMAN GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv01340
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. WITCHER
Defendant:
HARDING POORMAN GROUP, INC., STEVEN ANZALONE and ROBERT BURGER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
