Cases 11 - 20 of 319
Lafave, et al v. The County of Fairfax, Virginia, et al
as 1:2023cv01605
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY LAFAVE, Glenn M. Taubman and Robert Holzhauer
Defendant:
The County of Fairfax, Virginia, Kevin Davis, Chief of Police and Kevin Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Villanueva v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv12872
Plaintiff:
Jose Villanueva
Defendant:
Heidi E Washington, Richard D. Russell, Dave Shaver and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States of America v. Felder
as 23-6192
Defendant:
JERMAINE BRANFORD, ENAL C. LAROSE, MIZAIR LICONA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TYRONE FELDER, Seled Defendant #3 and T-Bone
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Dye #785330 v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
David Lyle Dye #785330
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Catherine Bauman, P. Hubble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ADKINS et al v 3M COMPANY
as 9:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
TODD ADKINS, TEMITOPE AMUSA, JULIO AVILA and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LAFAVER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10298
Plaintiff:
SCOTT LAFAVER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
