Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Timothy Lafferty v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 26-13098
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY LAFFERTY
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Timothy Lafferty v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 26-13095
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY LAFFERTY
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Lafferty v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 8:2026cv02453
Plaintiff:
John Lafferty
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Voorhis v. Brittain et al
as 3:2026cv02346
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Voorhis
Defendant:
Kathy Brittain, Gomonda Goodson, Honorable Judge Timothy Beveridge and others
Amicus Curiae:
Justin Kern and Robert Merski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LAFFERTY v. WALTON et al
as 2:2026cv05540
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LAFFERTY
Defendant:
C.O. WALTON, SGT. VILLAMARIN, SARAH BOWLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lafferty v. Bean
as 2:2026cv01724
Plaintiff:
Charles Lafferty, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Able Events Inc V. Williams Grand Prix Engineering Limited et al
as 5:2026cv02962
Plaintiff:
Able Events Inc. and Combine Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Williams Grand Prix Engineering Limited, Claire Williams, Michael O'Driscoll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
United States v. Joseph Lafferty
as 26-1866
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Joseph Lafferty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv03181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
IN RE CONCORDE INTERNATIONAL GROUP SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 1:2026cv02283
Defendant:
Concorde International Group, Ltd., Swee Kheng Chua, Sze Yin Ong and others
Plaintiff:
Parthasarathy Krishnamoorthy
Petitioner:
Andrea Moretti
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
