Cases 1 - 9 of 9
WARREN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv21604
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LATOYA WARREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOE v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2019cv00954
Defendant:
DAN HANCOCK, SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathan Hoye v. Allegheny County Medical Staff, et al
as 17-3770
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN ROWSHAWN HOYE
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY MEDICAL STAFF, Through Corrizon, LATOYA WARREN, of Medical. Medical Deputy in charge and WARDEN ORLANDO L. HARPER
Defendant:
KATHRYN M. KENYON, Esquire and WESTER PHYSC
BEHANNA v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
MELISSA BEHANNA
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ORLANDO HARPER, LATOYA WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOYE v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY MEDICAL STAFF DEPT. et al
as 2:2017cv00020
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ROWSHAWN HOYE
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY MEDICAL STAFF DEPT., LATOYA WARREN and ORLANDO HARPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITLOW v. CORIZON, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01874
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA JEWETT WHITLOW
Defendant:
CORIZON, INC. , CORIZON HEALTH, INC. , ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIFFORD v. HARPER et al
as 2:2015cv00613
Plaintiff:
CHARLES GIFFORD
Defendant:
ORLANDO HARPER, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ERO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv12744
Plaintiff:
Latoya Warren
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Healthcare, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
