Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MENDOZA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv05202
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LAURA MENDOZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mendoza et al v. Southwest Airlines Company et al
as 2:2017cv02303
Plaintiff:
Laura Mendoza and Saul Mendoza
Defendant:
Southwest Airlines Company and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GKLST 5207 Zelzah, LLC v. Derrick Robinson et al
as 2:2017cv01615
Defendant:
Norrente Dennis, Does, Laura Mendoza and others
Plaintiff:
GKLST 5207 Zelzah, LLC
Ramon Mendoza v. John Does, #1-5, et al
as 16-1807
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ramon Mendoza
Plaintiff:
Laura Mendoza
Defendant:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and John Does, #6-10
Defendant - Appellee:
John Does, #1-5, Jeff Davis, Sarpy County, Nebraska Sheriff, Justin Osterberg, individually and others
Laura Mendoza et al v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 2:2015cv07611
Defendant:
Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., Ethicon Inc, Johnson and Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Laura Mendoza and Ron Mendoza
Mendoza v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 8:2013cv00065
Defendant:
Jeff Davis, John Does, #1-5, John Does, #6-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Laura Mendoza and Ramon Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mendoza v. Texas EZPawn, L.P.
as 1:2007cv00562
Plaintiff:
Laura Mendoza
Defendant:
Texas EZPawn, L.P., Texas EZPawn, L.P., Texas EZPawn, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Fender v. McDonough et al
as 8:2007cv00229
Plaintiff:
Lemuel M. Fender
Defendant:
James R. McDonough, Daniel Cherry, III, Do Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faison et al v. Texas EZPawn, L.P.
as 3:2007cv00067
Plaintiff:
Hasani Faison, Hasani Faison, Troy Donavan Logue and others
Defendant:
Texas EZPawn, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
