Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Auclair v. Corning Incorporated
as 24-1172
Plaintiff:
BRIAN AUCLAIR
Not Yet Classified:
CORNING INCORPORATED, CORNING PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY
Martin v. Jones et al
as 6:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Amy Martin
Defendant:
Jared Jones, Layne Christensen Company, Valley Forge Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00701
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Macy's West Stores, Inc. v. Tutor Perini Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv02697
Plaintiff:
Macy's West Stores, Inc.
Defendant:
Tutor Perini Corporation , Bencor Global, Inc. and Layne Christensen Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raul v. Layne Christensen Company et al
as 4:2018cv01056
Plaintiff:
Malka Raul
Defendant:
Layne Christensen Company, David A.B. Brown, J. Samuel Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Witmer v. Layne Christensen Company et al
as 4:2018cv01051
Plaintiff:
Colleen Witmer
Defendant:
Layne Christensen Company, David A.B. Brown, J. Samuel Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jose Alba v. Layne Christensen Company et al
as 2:2018cv00473
Plaintiff:
Jose Alba
Defendant:
Does and Layne Christensen Company
Layne Christensen Company et al v. City of Franklin, Tennessee
as 3:2017cv01236
Plaintiff:
Layne Christensen Company and Layne Heavy Civil, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Franklin, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-17773
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robinson v. Layne Christensen Company et al
as 8:2016cv02805
Plaintiff:
Tony A. Robinson
Defendant:
Layne Christensen Company, Greg Laszczynski, Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
