Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
EARLS v. NORTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION, THE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00734
Plaintiff: ANITA S. EARLS
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION, THE, THE HONORABLE CHRIS DILLON, THE HONORABLE DAWN M. LAYTON and others
Petitioner: LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Yashica Robinson, et al v. Attorney General, State of Ala, et al
as 20-11401
Defendant / Appellant: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and SCOTT HARRIS
Plaintiff / Appellee: YASHICA ROBINSON, ALABAMA WOMEN'S CENTER, WEST ALABAMA WOMEN'S CENTER and others
Not Classified By Court: AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, SERVICE, SISTERSONG WOMEN OF COLOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE COLLECTIVE and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF DELAWARE, STATE OF VERMONT, STATE OF KENTUCKY and others
303 Creative, et al v. Elenis, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1413
Defendant / Appellee: ANTHONY ARAGON, HEIDI HESS, MIGUEL RENE ELIAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: LORIE SMITH and 303 CREATIVE LLC, a limited liability company
Petitioner: FOUNDATION FOR MORAL LAW
Amicus Curiae: CATO INSTITUTE, CENTER FOR RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION, CATHOLICVOTE.ORG EDUCATION FUND and others
Mayor and City Council of Balt v. Alex Azar, II We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1614
Defendant / Appellant: OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Amicus Curiae: SOCIETY FOR ADOLESCENT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM, ALABAMA and others
James Obergefell, et al v. Richard Hodges, et al
as 14-3057
Amicus Curiae: WOMEN'S LAW PROJECT, NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS, GARY J. GATES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: DAVID BRIAN MICHENER, ROBERT GRUNN, JAMES OBERGEFELL and others
Defendant: CAMILLE JONES
Intervenor: CRAIG SCHEIDLER, EQUALITY OHIO, SARAH RUTH MARSHALL and others
Defendant / Appellant: THEODORE WYMYSLO, MD, In his official capacity as the Director of the Ohio Department of Health, LANCE D. HIMES, In his official capacity as the Interim Director of The Ohio Department of Health and RICHARD HODGES
USA v. Freeman Burkholder
as 13-3214
Amicus Curiae: PFLAG INTERNATIONAL, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: FREEMAN BURKHOLDER
USA v. Emanuel Schrock
as 13-3208
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: EMANUEL SCHROCK
Amicus Curiae: THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS, AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS and others
USA v. Lester Miller
as 13-3204
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: LESTER M. MILLER
Amicus Curiae: THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS, AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS and others
USA v. Lester Mullet
as 13-3202
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: LESTER S. MULLET
Amicus Curiae: THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS, AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS and others
USA v. Samuel Mullet, Sr.
as 13-3205
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: SAMUEL MULLET, SR.
Amicus Curiae: THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS, AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?