Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Williams v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
as 2:2017cv02095
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Plaintiff:
David Lee Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Moody, et al v. Michigan Gaming Control Board, et al
as 16-2369
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
JOHN MOODY, WALLY MCILLMURRAY, RICK RAY and others
Defendant:
MICHIGAN GAMING CONTROL BOARD, RICHARD KALM, GARY POST and others
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
AL ERNST and JOHN LESSNAU
John Moody, et al v. Michigan Gaming Control Board, et al
as 16-2244
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN MOODY, DONALD HARMON, RICK RAY and others
Defendant:
MICHIGAN GAMING CONTROL BOARD, RICHARD KALM, GARY POST and others
Defendant - Appellant:
AL ERNST and JOHN LESSNAU
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Williams v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00372
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Dickerson v. Brown(MAG+)
as 2:2016cv00203
Plaintiff:
Lee William Dickerson
Defendant:
Jimmy Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. Colvin et al (MAG+)
as 2:2016cv00204
Plaintiff:
Lee William Dickerson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin and Jimmy Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corbett v. Cuba, Missouri, City of et al
as 4:2015cv01817
Plaintiff:
Dane Corbett
Defendant:
Cuba, Missouri, City of , Ray Mortimeyer , Paul Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Episcopal Services
as 3:2015cv04868
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Williams
Defendant:
Episcopal Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01710
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
