Cases 21 - 30 of 86
Abdelhalim v. Lewis et al
as 1:2019cv00858
Defendant:
Armistead Park Homeowners Association, Andrew McDevitt, Dinara Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Ms. Nagla Abdelhalim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Stephens v. Atlanta Housing Authority, Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv02195
Defendant:
La Toya Matthews, Jacqueline Whatley, Georgia Department of Community Affairs and others
Plaintiff:
Kalyn Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Caplan v. J B LEWIS CARPET, INC. et al
as 9:2019cv80366
Defendant:
JA & AF ENTERPRISES, INC. and J B LEWIS CARPET, INC.
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
King v. Senator Philip D. Lewis Center et al
as 9:2019cv80061
Defendant:
Senator Philip D. Lewis Center, Reach Shelter Program, TIC Properties and others
Plaintiff:
Nikie King, Kawasaki Disease Awareness, Brianna Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. Jenkins et al
as 9:2018cv81756
Defendant:
TIC Properties, Gail Jenkins, Senator Phillip D. Lewis Center and others
Plaintiff:
Nikie King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. Preston
as 3:2018cv07199
Defendant:
Katherine Preston and Avalon Union City Apartment Complex
Plaintiff:
Cherie Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silber et al v. Airbnb, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01884
Plaintiff:
Alon Madiel, Samuel Silber, Howard Rabin and others
Defendant:
Airbnb, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stone et al v. Mehra-Pedersen et al
as 2:2018cv00467
Defendant:
Heather Kipling Mehra-Pedersen, Jimmy Hansen, Kyle Patten and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly Stone and William Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Caplan v. MURANSKY CHIROPRACTIC, P.A. et al
as 0:2018cv62513
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
MURANSKY CHIROPRACTIC, P.A. and MARTIN H. LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Jensen v. I.R.S., et al
as 17-4075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM A. JENSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
I.R.S., COMPTROLLER OF CURRENCY DEPT HUD 1A, HOWARD LEWIS & PETERSON, P.C. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
