Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 35,829
VERGARA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv05555
Defendant: REGINA INEZ PEOPLES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Plaintiff: LUIS EDUARDO VERGARA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ricks (PS) v. Babcock et al
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff: John Allen Ricks and John A. Ricks
Defendant: Lewis T. Babcock and Susan B. Prose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Bankers Warranty Group
as 8:2024cv00980
Plaintiff: Niya Lewis
Defendant: Bankers Warranty Group d/b/a Centricity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lewis v. Cleveland Medical Devices, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00725
Plaintiff: Robin Lewis
Defendant: Cleveland Medical Devices, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Lewis v. Warden Nance
as 8:2024cv02266
Petitioner: Justin Jamal Lewis
Respondent: Warden Nance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Heggie, Jr.
as 3:2024cv00501
Plaintiff: Stephanie Lewis
Defendant: Samuel B. Heggie, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11239
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03092
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Neisen and minor children (C.R., K.R., M.R.) v. Lewis et al
as 3:2024cv00495
Plaintiff: Heather Neisen and minor children (C.R., K.R., M.R.)
Defendant: Carl Benjamin Lewis and McCarter East PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
MACPEAK v. UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv01650
Plaintiff: Kathleen makpeak
Defendant: UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA and Morgan Lewis & Bockius Master welfare Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?