Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Kellam et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv13336
Defendant:
3M Company, Carrier Fire & Security Americas LLC, Carrier Fire & Security Corporation LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Kellam, Charles Keyser, Lee Knudsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 a1 Federal Officer Removal
Linda Richards v. ICU Medical, Inc et al
as 8:2024cv02524
Plaintiff:
Linda Richards
Defendant:
Smiths Medical ASD, Inc. and ICU Medical, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Linda Richards v. ICU Medical, Inc et al
as 5:2024cv02447
Defendant:
ICU Medical, Inc and Smiths Medical ASD, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Linda Richards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mako et al v. Linda Richards Inc., et al
as 7:2019cv02660
Defendant:
Linda Barry, Linda Bretti, Frank Bretti and others
Plaintiff:
Valerie Mako
Denham et al vs. Richard, et al
as 3:2018cv00742
Defendant:
XYZ Insurance Company, Linda Richard, East Baton Rouge Parish School Board and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Denham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richards v. 3M Company
as 0:2018cv01100
Plaintiff:
Linda Richards
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richards v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv06658
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Linda Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Richards v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv10528
Plaintiff:
Linda Richards
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00285
Defendant:
ABC Insurance Company and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Linda Richard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
