Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jones et al v. Vidrios San Miquel S L et al
as 3:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Dennis Milton Jones and Sherrill Lindsey Jones
Defendant:
Vidrios San Miquel S L, Elk Lighting Inc, Paul Michael doing business as Paul Michael Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones et al v. Paulk (CONSENT)
as 2:2020cv00844
Plaintiff:
John Michael Jones and Lindsey Jones
Defendant:
Ashley Paulk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey Jones v. CIR
as 20-70013
Petitioner / Appellant:
LINDSEY JONES
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Jones v. Res-Care Premiere, Inc.
as 2:2018cv04195
Defendant:
Res-Care Premiere, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ford et al v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, et al.
as 2:2018cv02582
Plaintiff:
Ashley T. Ford , DAVID WEST , Marisa Burns and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and Elisabeth DeVos
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Jones v. Jones et al
as 2:2018cv00896
Plaintiff:
Patrick Kent Lindsey Jones
Defendant:
Allen Kent Jones, Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., Simon, Peragine, Smith & Redfearn and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Lindsey Jones v. CitiMortgage, Inc., et al
as 15-14853
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDSEY JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC., STATE OF GEORGIA, for Fulton County Superior Court Judge Markle and PHELAN HALLINAN DIAMOND & JONES, PLLC
Massie v. Lindsey Jones, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv01128
Plaintiff:
Brennan Massie
Defendant:
Lindsey Jones, LLC and Dennis Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01002
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Jones
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. , Phelan Hallinan Diamond & Jones, PLLC and State of Georgia
Jones v. Citimortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00204
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Jones
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc. , Anthony Demarlo , Ashby L. Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
