Cases 11 - 20 of 2,842
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Lockett v. Clark et al
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Tyree Lockett
Defendant:
Sgt. Clark, Lt. Ngduea, Sgt. Slayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockett v. Accord Healthcare, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Wilma Lockett
Defendant:
Accord Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LOCKETT v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
DOLANDA LOCKETT
Defendant:
LIFECELL CORPORATION and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LOCKETT v. HARMON et al
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOCKETT
Defendant:
A. HARMON, GRAY, B. LUNSFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitch v. Garland
as 24-40017
Plaintiff:
Lamont Fitch
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Official capacity as U.S. Attorney General, Christopher Wray, Official Capacity as Director of F.B.I., Michael Carvajal, Official Capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
