Cases 1 - 10 of 328
Brooks v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
David Bryan Brooks
Defendant:
Brad Wilson, Donna Hetherington, Jody Pickens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cain v. Page et al
as 5:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Sgt Noah Page, Ofc Luke Jornstead, Ofc Tayor Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Embry et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Randi Thomas Embry, Luke Whittaker, Shawn Embry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Arthur Jackson v. Catherine Bauman, et al
as 24-1108
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR JACKSON
Defendant:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, UNKNOWN PARTIES #1, Named as John/Jane Does, Health Unit Manager and others
Luke, Inc. v. Berkley National Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv02048
Plaintiff:
Luke, Inc.
Defendant:
Berkley National Insurance Company
Not Yet Classified:
Clerk W. Aaron Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Dials v. President Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Luke Dials
Defendant:
President Inc. and Vadim Crudu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Thompson v. Springhetti et al
as 2:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jason Thompson
Defendant:
Scott Springhetti, Luke McKee, Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Webb v. Henderson County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Webb
Defendant:
Henderson County Jail, Jeffery Smith, Jackie Bausman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luke PattersonIn re: Luke Patterson
as 24-3123
Petitioner:
In re: LUKE D. PATTERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lohden v. Decker
as 4:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
John Edward Lohden, Jr.
Defendant:
Luke Decker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
