Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Thompson v. Louisiana Transitional Center for Women et al
as 3:2022cv06061
Plaintiff:
Shanell Lynn Thompson
Defendant:
Louisiana Transitional Center for Women, Chris Stinson and John Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Thompson
as 3:2021cv00121
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Romy Lynn Thompson
In Re:
In the Matter of Partitioning the Property of Skye Donald Dayton Thomas and Romy Lynn Thompson
Counter Defendant:
Skye Donald Dayton Thompson
3Rd Party Defendant:
Sheldon Thompson and Marie-Merced Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Terrence Thompson
as 20-10620
Defendant / Appellee:
TERRENCE LYNN THOMPSON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Thompson v. USA
as 3:2018cv02840
Petitioner:
Terrence Lynn Thompson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ortiz et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2016cv00950
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Plaintiff:
Maritza Ortiz , Carolyn Meadows , Ginger Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
USA v. Jackie Thompson
as 13-50605
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JACKIE LYNN THOMPSON
Ras Thompson v. William Trotter
as 13-10624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAS LYNN THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM CLAYTON TROTTER, Police Officer of Lubbock Police Department
Thompson v. MTC et al
as 3:2013cv00991
Plaintiff:
Dave Lynn Thompson
Defendant:
MTC , Unknown Jones and Frank Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. MTC et al
as 4:2012cv00201
Plaintiff:
Dave Lynn Thompson
Defendant:
MTC, Unknown Jones and Frank Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bazrowx v. Thompson et al
as 1:2012cv00594
Plaintiff:
Sarah Bazrowx
Defendant:
Lynn Thompson, Texas Home Health of America, LP , Guardian Home Care Holding, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
