Cases 1 - 10 of 11
JOHNSON v. NAJJAR et al
as 2:2021cv00318
Plaintiff:
QUANTAE A. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID K. NAJJAR, TODD RUETZ, JUDITH PROFFITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. NAJJAR et al
as 2:2021cv00305
Plaintiff:
QUANTAE A JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID K. NAJJAR, TODD RUETZ, MICHELLE MCCUEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCRUGGS v. MCDANIEL et al
as 2:2019cv00110
Defendant:
LEE HOEFLING, CAROL DILLON, CHARLIE DUGAN and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L. SCRUGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAINES v. CORIZON HEALTH et al
as 2:2016cv00243
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, FINOTE ASFAW, BRYAN BULLER and others
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO GAINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAINES v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2016cv00139
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, BRYAN BULLER, FARRAH BUNCH and others
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO GAINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. LYTLE et al
as 1:2016cv00281
Defendant:
CITY OF CARMEL, OFFICER BLAKE LYTLE, CHAPMAN MIKE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WAYNE REED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STROMINGER v. IDOC et al
as 1:2015cv01654
Defendant:
C. CONLON, CORIZON, G. EATON and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND STROMINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. BROWN et al
as 2:2012cv00299
Defendant:
Superintendent RICHARD BROWN, LYTLE, STALEY and others
Plaintiff:
ROY AUSTIN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLLEMAN v. ARAMARK CORPORATION et al
as 1:2011cv00323
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORPORATION, JANE DOE, LIEUTENANT SCOTT KING and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. HOLLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYTLE v. ASTRUE
as 4:2010cv00060
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
DONNA M. LYTLE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
