Cases 1 - 10 of 2,345
EMC Property & Casualty Company v. Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv01083
Plaintiff:
EMC Property & Casualty Company
Defendant:
Trevor Johnson, Crystal McMahon, Courtney Counter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lacy
as 8:2024cv01145
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Tyrone J Lacy
In re: Walmart Inc. Securities Litigation, et al, et al
as 24-1818
Plaintiff:
KIM KENGLE, as trustee of the Kim K.Kengle 2000 Trust and ROSEANNE LACY
Defendant:
WALMART INC, C. DOUGLAS MCMILLON and M. BRETT BIGGS, JR.
Lacy v. Villalobos et al
as 4:2024cv00896
Plaintiff:
Antonio Maurice Lacy
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Dana Sullivan, Nurse Practitioner Crystal Mable, UTMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trustees of the Cascade Pension Trust v. Harju, et al
as 1:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Cascade Pension Trust
Defendant:
Lacy Harju, Estate of Lorrin Patrick Jackson, Amanda R. Leonardo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hill v. Florio et al
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Anthony Hill
Defendant:
John Florio, Carlos Escobedo, Lacy Florio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Kevin M. De Hoog v. Masked Guards of Theo Lacy Strip Search
as 8:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. De Hoog
Defendant:
Masked Guards of Theo Lacy Strip Search
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin M. DeHoog v. Theo Lacy Masked Guards
as 8:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Kevin M DeHoog
Defendant:
Theo Lacy Masked Guards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
