Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Anzalone et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv12176
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Anzalone, Jo Ann Bachman, Laquita Banks and others
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Anzalone et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv12133
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Anzalone, Jo Ann Bachman, Laquita Banks and others
Defendant:
AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex, Archroma U.S. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv04703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2sh Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Davis et al v. e.l.f. Cosmetics, Inc.
as 1:2022cv05069
Plaintiff:
Ariel Davis, Lacie Davis and Taylor Davis
Defendant:
e.l.f. Cosmetics, Inc.
Davis v. Ricola USA, Inc.
as 3:2022cv03071
Plaintiff:
Lacie Davis
Defendant:
Ricola USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Little v. Maynard et al
as 3:2018cv01090
Plaintiff:
Ewell Lamar Little
Defendant:
Lacie Davis Little Maynard and Elizabeth Fain Byrne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Davis, III v. USA
as 1:2009cv01281
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lacy Davis, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
DAVIS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv05721
Plaintiff:
LACY DAVIS, III
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Lacy Davis, III
as 09-6241
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LACY DAVIS, III, a/k/a Lacey Davis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
