Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 29
LAES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04499
Plaintiff: STEVEN JAMES LAES
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LAE TECHNOLOGIES HONG KONG LIMITED v. DEMUREN
as 8:2023cv02316
Petitioner: LAE TECHNOLOGIES HONG KONG LIMITED
Respondent: OLUBUKUNMI OLUFEMI DEMUREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
APPLICATION OF LAE TECHNOLOGIES HONG KONG LIMITED FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 GRANTING LEAVE TO OBTAIN DISCOVERY FOR USE IN A FOREIGN PROCEEDING
as 3:2023cv02314
In Re: APPLICATION OF LAE TECHNOLOGIES HONG KONG LIMITED FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 GRANTING LEAVE TO OBTAIN DISCOVERY FOR USE IN A FOREIGN PROCEEDING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
LAE TECHNOLOGIES HONG KONG LIMITED v. DEMUREN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv02314
In Re: LAE TECHNOLOGIES HONG KONG LIMITED
Respondent: OLUBUKUNMI OLUFEMI DEMUREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Dauzat et al v. GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv02856
Plaintiff: Chantel Dauzat and John Lae
Defendant: GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
OROZCO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43106
Plaintiff: BRENDA LAE OROZCO
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. One 2004 Phaeton RV, VIN:4UZAAHAK24CM37627 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00519
Plaintiff: United States and USA
Defendant: $14,790.00 in United States Currency, One 2004 Phaeton RV, VIN:4UZAAHAK24CM37627 and $11,910.00 in United States Currency
Claimant: Jay Laes
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Seo v. Green Dry Cleaner & Laundry, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05118
Plaintiff: Yeon Seo
Defendant: Green Dry Cleaner & Laundry, Inc. and Ju Lae Cho
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Acosta v. Woo Lae Oak Food Group, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00785
Plaintiff: R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant: Woo Lae Oak Food Group, LLC, Hang Nam Paik and Kyung Hee Paik
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Laes v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2015cv00509
Plaintiff: Carolyn J. Laes
Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?