Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 7,638
Reese v. Bauman
as 5:2024cv10914
Petitioner: Deontez Lamar Reese
Respondent: Catherine Bauman
Andrews et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv10897
Plaintiff: Gerald E. Andrews, Mary Margaret Baker, John Franklin Bishop and others
Defendant: 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., AMEREX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
MADDOX v. MIMS et al
as 5:2024cv00110
Plaintiff: VIRGIL LAMAR MADDOX
Defendant: CHARLES MIMS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02734
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv02730
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Smith v. Maddux
as 1:2024cv01443
Petitioner: Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent: Melody M. Maddux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv02688
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Worsley v. Osborn Correctional Institution
as 3:2024cv00612
Plaintiff: Gamail Lamar Worsley
Defendant: Osborn Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Kasper Dobbs
as 24-1702
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Kasper Lamar Dobbs
WHITFIELD v. THOMPSON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv04422
Petitioner: ROBERT LAMAR WHITFIELD
Respondent: WARDEN RENEE THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?