Cases 61 - 70 of 7,642
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt v. Compton Cowboys, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02642
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Defendant:
Compton Cowboys, Inc., Israel Houghton, Jekalyn Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv00736
Plaintiff:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Ted Jackson, Officer Jones and Officer Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes et al v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Keiron Kenneth Holmes, Sr., Micky Eugene Hamilton, Jed Allen Taylor and others
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center, John T. Wilcher, Chatham County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Worsley v. Osborn Correctional Institution
as 3:2024cv00612
Plaintiff:
Gamail Lamar Worsley
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calvin v. Carter et al
as 2:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Jamon Lamar Calvin and Jaman Aaron Swope
Defendant:
Olivia Carter, Christina Lewis and Wisconsin Department of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
