Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Howard v. Unknown Defendant
as 0:2020cv00038
Defendant: Unknown Defendant
Plaintiff: Kerry Lamont Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Howard v. Paulson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2017cv01629
Defendant: Sharon Beck, C. Coffey, Dr. Christopher P. DiGuilio and others
Plaintiff: Clayton Lamont Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Wickham et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00665
Petitioner: Lamont Howard
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General and Harold Wickham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. USA
as 5:2015cv00503
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Russell Lamont Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Howard v. Nooth
as 2:2015cv00661
Petitioner: Clayton Lamont Howard
Respondent: Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Anderson et al
as 2:2014cv00084
Plaintiff: Lamont Howard
Defendant: Kathleen Anderson, Andrew Akins, J. Bradley Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quentin L Howard v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv02443
Petitioner: Quentin Lamont Howard
Respondent: United States of America
Lamont Howard v. Scott Wilkes, et al
as 10-15118
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAMONT HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee: SCOTT WILKES, in their individual and official capacity, DR. AYAZ CHAUDHARY, in their individual and official capacity, DR. YOUNG, in their individual and official capacity and others
Lamont Howard v. Terrie Mullis, et al
as 10-14350
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAMONT HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee: TERRIE MULLIS, TODD TRIPP, DONALD BARROW and others
Lamont Howard v. Larry Butts, et al
as 10-14157
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAMONT HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee: LARRY BUTTS, Unit Manager, JAMES BLAIR, Lt., WESLEY O'NEAL, Lt. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?