Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Genkos v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2014cv01253
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A. Genkos
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Steven King and Lance Jones
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Jones v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00404
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Lance Jones
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones v. USA et al
as 3:2012cv01371
Petitioner:
Lance Jones
Respondent:
USA and Jeff Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States of America v. Jones (Richardson)
as 12-1220
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Luke Jones, AKA Mega, Lance Jones, Lonnie Jones, AKA LT and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Kenneth Richardson
United States of America v. Jone
as 11-2936
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lance Jones, Lonnie Jones, AKA LT, Aaron Harris, AKA Dog, AKA Toast, AKA DMX, AKA Hit Man Sosa and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Luke Jones, AKA Mega
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jones v. USA
as 3:2010cv00628
Petitioner:
Lance Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Steward Jr v. Casper Community College District et al
as 1:2009cv00167
Plaintiff:
Abraham Steward Jr
Defendant:
Casper Community College District, State of Wyoming and Lance Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv02274
Plaintiff:
LANCE JONES
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
