Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Coates v. Delgado et al
as 8:2025cv02856
Plaintiff:
Nigel Coates
Defendant:
Sgt. Raul Delgado, Gaithersburg Police Department, Officer Nathan Engle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Melody Cooper v. Officer James Doyle
as 24-2131
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICERS, OFFICER JAMES DOYLE, SGT. WILLIE DELGADO and others
Plaintiff:
MELODY COOPER, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Kwamena Ocran
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02868
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Larbi v. Mitchell
as 1:2024cv00905
Defendant:
C/O Isaac S. Mitchell
Plaintiff:
Michael Larbi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larbi Semiani v. State of California et al
as 2:2024cv06187
Defendant:
State of California and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Larbi Semiani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larbi v. Tuttle et al
as 1:2024cv00774
Defendant:
Anthony L. Corea, Rachel R. Tuttle and Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Michael Larbi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rahman v. Vylla Title, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01282
Plaintiff:
Shakil Rahman
Defendant:
Vylla Title, LLC, Kofi Larbie Boateng and Comfort Akwaaba Boateng
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Amirouche v. USA
as 1:2024cv02596
Petitioner:
Larby Amirouche
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. Amirouche
as 23-7755
Defendant / Appellant:
LARBY AMIROUCHE and Luke Williams
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rahman v. Boateng, et al
as 8:2023cv02400
Plaintiff:
SHAKIL RAHMAN
Defendant:
Kofi Boateng, Comfort Akwaaba Boateng, Kamal Mustafa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
