Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Brown v. Barnett et al
as 2:2016cv13451
Defendant:
Larry Barnett, Arthur Leavell, Gregory Tourville and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond W. Brown, Jr.
McCallum et al v. Geelhood et al
as 2:2015cv12676
Defendant:
Stephen Geelhood , Amy Matelic , Bryan Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony McCallum and Elaine McCallum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCallum et al v. city of detroit et al
as 2:2015cv12672
Plaintiff:
Anthony McCallum and Elaine McCallum
Defendant:
city of detroit, Stephen Geelhood, Amy Matelic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nexity Bank et al v. Maverick Bancshares Inc et al
as 4:2013mc00029
Plaintiff:
Nexity Bank and Alostar Bank of Commerce
Defendant:
Maverick Bancshares Inc, Larry Barnett and Shahinul I Choudhury
Nexity Bank et al v. Maverick Bancshares, Inc. et al
as 4:2013mc00027
Defendant:
Maverick Bancshares, Inc., Larry Barnett, Shahinul I Choudhury and others
Plaintiff:
Nexity Bank and Alostar Bank of Commerce
White v. Kisselburg et al
as 2:2012cv13283
Plaintiff:
Bernard White
Defendant:
James Kisselburg, Larry Barnett and Detroit, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNETT v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 5:2008cv81017
Plaintiff:
LARRY BARNETT
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, ABER INSULATION, GRAVES-ABER INSULATION COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Larry Barnett v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.
as PAE/2:08-CV-67123
Plaintiff:
Larry Barnett
Defendant:
Owens-Illinois, Inc.
BARNETT v. OWENS-ILLINOIS
as 2:2008cv67123
Plaintiff:
LARRY BARNETT
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Walton et al v. Davis et al
as 2:2007cv04110
Plaintiff:
Jeannette Walton, Jeannette Walton, Larry Barnette, Sr and others
Defendant:
Bobby R Davis, Jr and PM Transport of Florida Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
