Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1100
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv03284
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Bancorp Bank v. Advanced Payroll Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02088
Defendant:
Zuma Payroll Solutions, LLC, Payroll Logix, Inc., Wiggins Payroll, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
The Bancorp Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Kennedy v. Greenstein et al
as 1:2019cv00110
Defendant:
Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education (PASSHE), Clifton Larson Allen LLP, Association of Pennsylvania State College and University Facilities (APSCUF) and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Palmer v. Clifton Larson Allen
as 2:2018cv01397
Plaintiff:
Judith Palmer
Defendant:
Clifton Larson Allen and Clifton Larson Allen, LLP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Hoang et al v. Rosen et al
as 8:2016cv01592
Plaintiff:
Minh Vu Hoang and Thanh Hoang
Defendant:
Gary A. Rosen, Roger Schlossberg, Marion A. Hecht and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2152
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant Counterclaimant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2141
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant Counterclaimant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Schmidt et al
as 2:2014mc00062
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Lawrence P Schmidt, Futuregen Company, Commercial Equity Partners Ltd and others
Receiver:
Clifton Larson Allen LLP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
