Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 260
Crosby et al v. Lasership, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv08694
Plaintiff:
Robert Crosby , John Lewis , Eli Jackson and others
Defendant:
Lasership, Inc. and Mahmoud, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Calamonaci v. Lasership, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03402
Plaintiff:
Dominick Mario Calamonaci
Defendant:
Lasership, Inc. , Laser Courier, Inc. and Steve Provenzano
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Lasership, Inc.
as 3:2015mc00031
Respondent:
Lasership, Inc.
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Type:
Other Statutes
The City of New York v. Lasership, Inc.
as 1:2013cv07535
Plaintiff:
The City of New York
Defendant:
Lasership, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ArrivalStar S.A. et al v. LaserShip
as 1:2013cv22570
Plaintiff:
ArrivalStar S.A. and Melvino Technologies Limited
Defendant:
LaserShip
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Manuel Sanchez v. Lasership, Inc.
as 13-1478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANUEL MILTON SANCHEZ, individually and on behalf of a group of individuals similarly situated, CARMELO MEDINA, individually and on behalf of a group of individuals similarly situated and GERARD EDMOND, individually and on behalf of a group of individuals similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
LASERSHIP, INC.
Sanchez et al v. Lasership, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00246
Plaintiff:
Manuel Milton Sanchez , Carmelo Medina and Gerard Edmond
Defendant:
Lasership, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lopez v. Connelly et al
as 1:2011cv04533
Plaintiff:
Luther Lopez
Defendant:
Mimi Connelly, Ali Dilmaghani and Lasership Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanchez et al v. Lasership, Inc.
as 1:2011cv10990
Plaintiff:
Milton Manuel Sanchez , Carmelo Medina and Gerard Edmond
Defendant:
Lasership, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
