Cases 31 - 40 of 438
Mawule Tepe v. USA, et al
as 23-5188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CURTIS L. COLLIER, United States District Court Judge, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, United States Magistrate Judge and others
Brandon Coffey v. Higgins, et al
as 23-1275
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brandon Coffey
Defendant / Appellee:
Higgins, Sheriff, Pulaski County, Calvin, Captain, PCDF, Thompson, Major, PCDF and others
Lattimore v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv00549
Plaintiff:
Benikie Lattimore
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shelton v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01187
Plaintiff:
Dearius Shelton
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01156
Plaintiff:
Rodney Smith
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01184
Plaintiff:
Laron Evans
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01182
Plaintiff:
De'Marius Johnson
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01163
Plaintiff:
Richard O Smith
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battles v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01179
Plaintiff:
Robert Battles
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrell v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01192
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harrell
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
