Cases 1 - 10 of 100
LAU v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2026cv06741
Plaintiff:
MARK LAU
Defendant:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI US SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. Harper et al
as 3:2026cv04844
Plaintiff:
Terrie L. Walker
Defendant:
Michael T. Harper, Rene J. Harper, James M. Biazevich and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Eng v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2026cv07163
Plaintiff:
Martin Lee Eng
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Darren McCray, Michael M. Bordessa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lan et al
as 2:2026cv02092
Petitioner:
Ms. Chan Mei Lan and Ms. Lau So Kim
Defendant:
Haijun Xia
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Lau v. CARNIVAL CORPORATION LTD
as 1:2026cv24620
Plaintiff:
Yick Lau
Defendant:
CATALINA CLASSIC CRUISES, INC. and Carnival Corporation, Ltd. a Bermudian corporation d/b/a Carnival Cruise Lines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Chiu Chan v. Justina Hii, et al.,
as 2:2026cv06244
Plaintiff:
Chiu Chan
Defendant:
Justina HII and Joseph C Lau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Feifei Gu v. Donald Trump, et al
as 26-5196
Plaintiff:
Feifei Gu
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Honorable President, Letitia James, as NY Attorney General, Todd Blanche, as US Attorney General and others
Hinton v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2026cv03341
Plaintiff:
Lori A. Hinton
Defendant:
The United States of America, United States Postal Service, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
