Cases 1 - 10 of 19
John Doe No 19-3251 v. Chier Intake Jonathan Gast, et al
as 23-55006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE NO 19-3251
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIER INTAKE JONATHAN GAST, FHEO, CITY OF LOS ANGELES and others
John Doe No 19-3251 v. Jonathan Gast et al
as 2:2022cv09273
Plaintiff:
John Doe No 19-3251
Defendant:
Chier Intake Jonathan Gast, FHEO, City of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
David Lucas et al v. Kia America, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv02090
Plaintiff:
David Lucas, Deborah Bennett, Marchae Winston and others
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc. and Hyundai Motor America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Curcio v. Grossman
as 22-693
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rosanna Curcio
Defendant / Appellee:
Donna E. Abrams, Laura Roberts, County of Putnam and others
Curcio v. Grossman et al
as 7:2022cv01648
Plaintiff:
Rosanna Curcio
Defendant:
Putnam Judge Victor Grossman, Donna E. Abrams, Laura Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curcio v. Grossman et al
as 1:2021cv04452
Defendant:
Victor Grossman, Donna E. Abrams and Laura Roberts
Plaintiff:
Rosanna Curcio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc
ROBERTS v. REGAL CINEMAS INC
as 4:2021cv00188
Plaintiff:
LAURA ROBERTS
Defendant:
Regal Cinemas Inc. and REGAL CINEMAS INC doing business as GOVERNORS SQUARE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv10313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ROBERTS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv15118
Plaintiff:
LAURA ROBERTS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlos Scott v. Laura Roberts, et al
as 20-30284
Defendant / Appellee:
DEANNA HARRIS, LAURA ROBERTS, PAMELA HEARNS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS SCOTT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
