Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Braulio Espinosa, et al v. Pershing, L.L.C.
as 18-11087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRAULIO A. VARGAS ESPINOSA, EDUARDO BELMONTE, MAURO BELMONTE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PERSHING, L.L.C.
Ruiz v. AH 2005 Management, L.P.
as 3:2017cv00197
Defendant:
AH 2005 Management, L.P.
Plaintiff:
Laura Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv33423
Plaintiff:
Laura Ruiz
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barbar et al v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company et al
as 3:2013cv02571
Plaintiff:
Roberto Barbar , Isabel Molero , Samir Barbar and others
Defendant:
Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, Willis of Colorado Inc and Willis Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Barbar et al v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company et al
as 1:2013cv21974
Plaintiff:
Roberto Barbar , Isabel Molero , Samir Barbar and others
Defendant:
Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, Willis of Colorado Inc. and Willis Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Barbar et al v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company et al
as FLS/1:13-cv-21974
Plaintiff:
Roberto Barbar , Isabel Molero , Samir Barbar and others
Defendant:
Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company , Willis of Colorado Inc. and Willis Ltd.
USA v. Laura Ruiz De Julian
as 13-50096
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LAURA RUIZ DE JULIAN
Ruiz v. City of Canton, Ohio et al
as 5:2010cv00460
Plaintiff:
Laura Ruiz
Defendant:
City of Canton, Ohio, James Riddell, Dean McKimm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
