Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Henderson v. Simpson, et al
as 22-1135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ELISABETH SIMPSON, JOEL ARNOLD, WADE MERCER and others
Keith Henderson v. Wade Mercer, et al
as 21-12462
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
WADE MERCER, HENRY MARK SIMS, ELISABETH SIMPSON and others
Keith Henderson v. Wade Mercer, et al
as 21-12235
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY MARK SIMS, ELISABETH SIMPSON, LAUREN PARRISH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH HENDERSON
Henderson v. Mercer et al
as 3:2021cv00620
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Donald Bryant, Timothy Hardrick and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. MERCER et al
as 7:2021cv00053
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, DONALD BRYANT, JUDGE W LOUIS SANDS and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Simpson et al
as 1:2021cv00606
Defendant:
Wade Owens, Public Defender Fourteenth Judicial Circuit, Joel Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ron Parrish, et al v. Bentonville School District, et al
as 17-1915
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ron Parrish, Parents of L, Lauren Parrish, Parents of L, Victor Craig, Parents of A and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Bentonville School District, Arkansas Department of Education and Johnny Key, Commissioner
Defendant:
Michael Poore, District Superintendent, Tanya Sharp, District Executive Director Student Services, Rebecca Powers, Bentonville School Board and others
Parrish et al v. Bentonville School District et al
as 4:2016mc00013
Plaintiff:
Ron Parrish and Lauren Parrish
Defendant:
Bentonville School District and Michael Poore
Parrish et al v. Bentonville School District et al
as 5:2015cv05083
Plaintiff:
Ron Parrish , Lauren Parrish , Victor Craig and others
Defendant:
Bentonville School District , Michael Poore , Tanya Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
