Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Richard v. Harris et al
as 6:2019cv01188
Defendant:
Darnell Savoy, Ebony Martin, Baton Rouge General and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Richard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Hajdasz v. Lawrence Metsch
as 19-12528
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellant:
LAWRENCE RICHARD METSCH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TIMOTHY HAJDASZ
Richard v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 1:2019dp20050
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Richard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard v. Harris et al
as 6:2018cv00149
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Richard
Defendant:
Alonzo Harris, Bruce Gaudin, Bobby Guidroz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. CHEYNEY UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv01681
Plaintiff:
MORGAN SCOTT
Defendant:
CHEYNEY UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA , LAWRENCE RICHARDS , SHEILAH VANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steele v. US Parole Commission et al
as 3:2016cv05265
Petitioner:
Lawrence Richard Steele
Respondent:
US Parole Commission , Kevin Straite and Marion Feather
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States of America v. Geisewite
as 2:2014cv02538
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lawrence Richard Geisewite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
JONES v. PHILADELPHIA - COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2014cv01795
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE RICHARD JONES
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA - COUNTY PRISON, HOUSE OF CORRECTION and CURAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shuster v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2013cv01035
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Richard Shuster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
