Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Podhurst Orseck, P.A., as Chair Lead Counsel of the Takata Airbags Products Liability Litigation and on behalf of the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee of the Takata Airbags Products Liability Liti v. VERISTAR, LLC
as 1:2022cv23660
Plaintiff: Podhurst Orseck, P.A., as Chair Lead Counsel of the Takata Airbags Products Liability Litigation and on behalf of the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee of the Takata Airbags Products Liability Liti
Defendant: VERISTAR, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
PODHURST ORSECK, P.A., as Chair Lead Counsel of the Takata Airbags Products Liability Litigation and on behalf of the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee of the Takata Airbags Products Liability Litig v. VERISTAR, LLC
as 1:2022cv23658
Plaintiff: PODHURST ORSECK, P.A., as Chair Lead Counsel of the Takata Airbags Products Liability Litigation and on behalf of the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee of the Takata Airbags Products Liability Litig
Defendant: VERISTAR, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
PODHURST ORSECK, P.A., as Chair Lead Counsel of the Takata Airbags Products Liability Litigation and on behalf of the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee of the Takata Airbags Products Liability Litig
as 1:2022cv23659
Plaintiff: PODHURST ORSECK, P.A., as Chair Lead Counsel of the Takata Airbags Products Liability Litigation and on behalf of the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee of the Takata Airbags Products Liability Litig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Mengesha v. Bitconnect International PLC et al
as 9:2018cv81329
Plaintiff: BitConnect Investor Group, Co-Lead Counsel, Patricia Mengesha and others
Defendant: Bitconnect LTD, Bitconnect International PLC and Bitconnect Trading LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mengesha v. Bitconnect International PLC et al
as 0:2018cv00279
Defendant: Bitconnect International PLC, Bitconnect LTD and Bitconnect Trading LTD
Plaintiff: Patricia Mengesha, BitConnect Investor Group, Co-Lead Counsel and others
Petitioner: Albert Parks and Faramarz Shemirani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medical Informatics Engineering Inc Customer Data Security Breach Litigation (MDL 2667)
as 3:2015md02667
Plaintiff: Plaintiffs' Interim Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re Anthem, Inc. Data Breach Litigation
as 5:2015md02617
Plaintiff: Marissa Nasca, Nicholas Bowes, Gregory Burke and others
Defendant: Anthem Life Insurance Company, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Inc., Highmark Health Services and others
Appellant: Leona Boone
In Re: Anthem, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
Not Classified By Court: Andrew Coddington, Kelly Kress, Adam Schulman and others
Petitioner: Jeffrey Walton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
IN RE: IntraMTA Switched Access Charges Litigation
as 3:2014md02587
Plaintiff: Plaintiffs' Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant: Defendants' Lead Counsel and Defendants' Counsel
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 206
In Re: Telexfree Securities Litigation
as 4:2014md02566
Plaintiff: UKACHI OKEHIE, Stanley Onyeabo, Paulo Eduardo Ferrari and others
Defendant: Doe Payment Processing Services, Babener & Associates, Doe Inside Promoters and others
Petitioner: Lee M. Pollack
Interested Party: Interim Lead Counsel and Plaintiffs' Interim Executive Committee, United States of America, Michael Montalvo and others
In Re: Telexfree Securities Litigation and Robert J. Bonsignore
Intervenor: Stephen B. Darr as Trustee of the Chapter 11 Estates of TelexFree, Inc. and TelexFree, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor et al v. Pfizer, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00465
Plaintiff: Tina Taylor , Casey Taylor , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and others
Defendant: Pfizer, Inc., Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?