Cases 1 - 10 of 10
KENT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv36186
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DURAND LEE KENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kent v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00044
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Kent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Kent v. United States Federal Government
as 6:2018cv06646
Defendant:
United States Federal Government
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Kent, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kent v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 5:2018cv00256
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Kent
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lee Hempfling, et al v. M. Voyles, et al
as 17-16329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEE KENT HEMPFLING and SUESIE KENT HEMPFLING
Defendant - Appellee:
M. LANDO VOYLES, BOYD T. JOHNSON and MARK BRNOVICH
Hempfling et al v. Voyles et al
as 2:2016cv03213
Plaintiff:
Lee Kent Hempfling and Suesie Kent Hempfling
Defendant:
M Lando Voyles, Boyd T Johnson, Bradley M Soos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hempfling et al v. Stanford et al
as 2:2015cv02268
Plaintiff:
Lee Kent Hempfling and Suesie Kent Hempfling
Defendant:
Amanda Stanford and Lynn Hurley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hempfling et al v. Stanford et al
as 2:2015cv01475
Plaintiff:
Lee Kent Hempfling and Suesie Kent Hempfling
Defendant:
Amanda Stanford, Lynn Hurley and Pinal County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kent, Sr. et al v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02609
Plaintiff:
George Russell Lee Kent, Sr. and Teresa Ann Jennes
Defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kent et al v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
as 1:2014cv02362
Plaintiff:
Frederick Kent and Lee Kent
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
