Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Anjali Ward v. Judith Lawrence, et al
as 23-15790
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANJALI WARD
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDITH LAWRENCE, CHAU NGUYEN, MARK ROBISON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01560
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03102
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07309
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gucci America, Incorporated v. Li
as 12-4557
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Gucci America, Incorporated, Balenciaga America, Incorporated, Balenciaga, S.A. and others
Appellant:
Bank Of China
Defendant:
Weixing Li, DBA Redtagparty, DBA Myluxurybags.com, DBA Xpressdesginers.com, DBA Xpressdesigner.net, DBA Designer Handbags, AKA Xin Li, Lijun Xu, DBA Redtagparty, AKA Jack London, Myluxurybags.com and others
Movant:
The Clearing House Association L.L.C. and Institute of International Bankers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3934
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Xu v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv11054
Plaintiff:
Lei Xu
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Karen-Ann Haydon and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Qi et al v Alberto R. Gonzales, et al
as 5:2007cv01739
Plaintiff:
Liwei Qi and Lei Xu
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
