Cases
Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC et al v. Leissner We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv05266
Petitioner: Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., The and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Respondent: Tim Leissner
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 203 Jurisdiction; amount in controversy
Rodriguez v. Goldey et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00921
Plaintiff: Jeremiah Rodriguez
Defendant: Warden Goldey, Associate Warden Michelli, Captain Bouche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Horner et al v. United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00105
Defendant: L Howard, CO Watkins, Lt. LaSalle and others
Plaintiff: John R Horner and Billy Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Razak v. Leissner et al
as 1:2020cv09638
Respondent: Timothy Leissner and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Petitioner: Mohd Najib Bin Abd Razak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEISSNER v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv01207
Plaintiff: WILLIAM LEISSNER
Defendant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chang et al v. Shahriz Bin Abdul Aziz et al
as 1:2016cv06386
Plaintiff: Matthias Chang and Husam Musa
Defendant: Riza Shahriz Bin Abdul Aziz, Low Taek Jho, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Leissner et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv20702
Plaintiff: Tracy Leissner and Shawn Leissner
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. BEY
as 2:2007cv05555
Plaintiff: THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, JENNIFER LEISSNER, FRANK KENNEDY and others
Defendant: YAHANNA: YISRAEL: BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?