Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Wilcox et al v. Seven Sports Bar & Lounge, LLC
as 1:2023cv05284
Plaintiff:
Amanda Wilcox
Defendant:
Seven Sports Bar & Lounge, LLC, Ernest Earvin, III, Clyde Usher and others
Lewis Butler v. Warden
as 2:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
Lewis Butler
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv26553
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LEWIS BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS-BUTLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv02433
Plaintiff:
MAGGIE LEWIS-BUTLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Michael Butler v. Larry Norris, et al
as 10-1672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Lewis Butler
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Greg Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Cheryl Evans, Lt., East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.37 OF AN ACRE OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATED IN ESCAMBIA COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 3:2010cv00014
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
0.37 OF AN ACRE OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATED IN ESCAMBIA COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA, CLASSIE HALL, THE ESTATE OF ROBERT J. LOVELACE, and the unknown heirs, devisees, grantees, assignees, lienors, creditors, trustees, personal representatives, or other claiming by, through, under, or against the Est and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258 (a) Public Buildings & Property: Land Condem
Butler v. Norris et al
as 2:2007cv00128
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Butler
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Harmon, Sherryl Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
as 3:2007cv00125
Plaintiff:
Melinda Robinson, Melinda Robinson, Melinda Robinson and others
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
