Cases 1 - 10 of 18
McGuire v. Kansas City Missouri, City of et al
as 4:2021cv00651
Plaintiff:
Andrew E McGuire
Defendant:
Kansas City Missouri, City of, Quinton D Lucas, Cecilia Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bell v. Young et al
as 4:2021cv04134
Plaintiff:
Shane Douglas Bell
Defendant:
Darin Young, Troy Ponto, Jennifer Dreiske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cody v. Bowers et al
as 4:2019cv04026
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Dr. Kenra Ott, Steve Baker and others
Plaintiff:
William Cody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv02651
Plaintiff:
Amy Johnson , Patricia Adolph , Paul Artac and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. , Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2017cv04116
Plaintiff:
James Elmer Shaw
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Robert Dooley, Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Cody v. Ashley McDonald, et al
as 17-2611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William R. Cody
Defendant - Appellee:
Ashley McDonald, Tim Meirose, Darin Young and others
William Cody v. Ashley McDonald, et al
as 16-1764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William R. Cody
Defendant - Appellee:
Ashley McDonald, Tim Meirose, Darin Young and others
Jesse Tiedeman v. Douglas Weber, et al
as 14-3310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jesse Claude Tiedeman
Defendant - Appellee:
Douglas L. Weber, Director of Prison Operations at South Dakota State Penitentiary, Troy Ponto, Assoc. Warden, Clifton Fantroy, Unit Manager and others
Cody v. McDonald et al
as 4:2014cv04155
Plaintiff:
William Cody
Defendant:
Ashley McDonald, Tim Meirose, Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
