Cases 1 - 6 of 6
STOVER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv14088
Plaintiff:
LINDA STOVER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Frank Heindel v. Marci Andino
as 19-1204
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT MOSELY, Member of the South Carolina State Election Commission, in his official capacity, BILLY WAY, JR., Chair of the South Carolina State Election Commission, in his official capacity, MARCI ANDINO, Executive Director of the South Carolina State Election Commission, in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK HEINDEL and PHIL P. LEVENTIS
Amicus Curiae:
MAGGIE TOULOUSE OLIVER, Secretary of State for New Mexico, DUNCAN A. BUELL, Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering and NCR Chair of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Carolina, JOSEPH R. KINIRY, Principal Scientist, Galois, and Principled CEO and Chief Scientist, Free & Fair and others
Robinson v. The State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2018cv00665
Defendant:
US Department of Energy, Moises Molias, Social Security Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Sant Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stover et al v. Hatley et al
as 3:2015cv00285
Defendant:
Carson, City Of and Sam Hatley
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Stover and Linda Stover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Derrick Foster v. Jeffrey Raleigh, et al
as 11-1572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK L. FOSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY RALEIGH, JERRY MARTINEZ, A.D. TOLLACKSON and others
Foster v. Raleigh et al
as 3:2010cv01804
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Foster
Defendant:
Jeffrey S. Raleigh, Jerry C. Martinez, A. D. Tollackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
