Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Carlos Toombs v. Dianna Massingill, et al
as 14-10211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS WAYNE TOOMBS
Defendant - Appellee:
DIANNA L. MASSINGILL, Assistant District Attorney, TIM CANTRELL, Trial Counsel, RICKY DEARMON, Amarillo Police Officer and others
Vaughn-Kriteman v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company
as 8:2014cv00235
Plaintiff:
Linda Vaughn-Kriteman
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vaughn et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05292
Plaintiff:
Linda Vaughn and Robert Vaughn
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Toombs v. Massingill et al
as 2:2013cv00245
Plaintiff:
Carlos Wayne Toombs
Defendant:
Dianna L Massingill, Tim Cantrell, Ricky DeArmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn et al v. Watson Pharmaceuticals Incorporated et al
as 1:2012cv06299
Plaintiff:
Linda Vaughn , Charles Earl Vaughn , Anna Marie Vaughn and others
Defendant:
Watson Pharmaceuticals Incorporated , Watson Laboratories Incorporated , Watson Pharma Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vaughn et al v. Watson Pharmaceuticals Incorporated et al
as 4:2011cv00407
Plaintiff:
Linda Vaughn, Anna Marie Vaughn, Joshua Anthony Vaughn and others
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Watson Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Watson Pharma Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vaughn et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2007cv00482
Plaintiff:
Linda Vaughn and Ricky Vaughn
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Linda Vaughn, etc. v. Borg-Warner Corp., et al.
as FLM/8:05-CV-00978
Plaintiff:
Linda Vaughn, etc.
Defendant:
Borg-Warner Corp
Linda Vaughn, etc. v. Borg-Warner Corp., et al.
as FLM/8:05-CV-00252
Plaintiff:
Linda Vaughn, etc.
Defendant:
Borg-Warner Corp
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
