Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05169
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Liquidity Services, Inc. v. Rozdilsky
as 8:2023cv01653
Plaintiff: Liquidity Services, Inc.
Defendant: Nicholas Rozdilsky
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv03355
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 a Damages in cases of intentional discrim. in employment
LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC. v. ROZDILSKY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv02158
Plaintiff: LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC
Defendant: NICHOLAS ROZDILSKY
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2021cv01229
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv50091
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
ABLORH et al v. LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2019cv02518
Defendant: LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff: SYLVIA ABLORH, Mr. FREDERICK ABLORH and FREDERICK ABLORH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Luxottica Group S.p.A. v. Liquidity Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04105
Defendant: DOES 1-10, inclusive and Liquidity Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Luxottica Group S.p.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
APB Realty, Inc. v. Georgia-Pacific LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1311
Defendant: LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC. and BEASLEY FOREST PRODUCTS, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant: APB REALTY, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC
BRADY v. LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2019cv00632
Defendant: LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff: DANIEL BRADY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?